That’s because uncertainty intolerance can theoretically be changed through interventions like cognitive behavioral therapy.Įncouraging people to tolerate more uncertainty may steer them away from seeing the world through a thick ideological lens, which often “hampers bipartisan cooperation and can even undermine the basic principles of democracy,” the researchers wrote. Is partisanship a treatable mental health condition?Īlso encouraging is the overall finding that uncertainty intolerance exacerbates the formation of rigid political beliefs. It suggests that people might not be as inclined to succumb to ideology when information is presented in a more neutral, level-headed fashion. “Even though abortion is a highly polarizing topic, the neutrally-worded news video yielded much less ideology-driven neural synchrony than the inflammatory debate video, which suggests that polarized perception is not just driven by ideological differences but also by the way polarizing issues are presented,” the researchers wrote. By piecing together Neolithic pottery fragments and ancient human genomes. Interestingly, the video segment on abortion didn’t produce much neural synchrony. In laymans terms, their complaint is this: Liberals, who claim to be tolerant, are actually intolerant of religious people and want to ban them from the. The trait became common in just a few thousand years, and today it’s found in up to 95 percent of the population. “Rather than ideology alone, cognitive traits such as intolerance to uncertainty - which interact with ideology to form a polarized perception of the world - may be the linchpin of political polarization.” Hot-button topics don’t have to be polarizing “This suggests that uncertainty-intolerant individuals see the political world through a stronger partisan lens, construing a more biased picture of the political reality,” the researchers wrote.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |